On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:09:00AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Simon > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:36:24PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > >> Z and ZG clocks on sh73a0 have pll0 as their parent, not pll1. > > > > > > > > Thanks I have applied this to the soc5 branch and thus queued it up for v3.10. > > > > Please let me know if you would prefer me to push it as a fix for v3.9. > > > > And in that vein, if you regard it as -stable material. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Perhaps other people disagree, but I recommend not being so trigger > > > happy with -stable unless it will potentially give us some upside. > > > AFAIK there is no in-tree consumer of this clock anyway, so involving > > > -stable without further testing seems like a lot of hassle with no > > > real benefit. > > > > If there is no in-tree consumer then it is not v3.9 or -stable material. > > Just to confirm, that I'm not aware of any current consumers of these > clocks, so, no rush with stable. Thanks. I'll leave it queued up for 3.10. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
