On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> Z and ZG clocks on sh73a0 have pll0 as their parent, not pll1. > > Thanks I have applied this to the soc5 branch and thus queued it up for v3.10. > Please let me know if you would prefer me to push it as a fix for v3.9. > And in that vein, if you regard it as -stable material. Thanks. Perhaps other people disagree, but I recommend not being so trigger happy with -stable unless it will potentially give us some upside. AFAIK there is no in-tree consumer of this clock anyway, so involving -stable without further testing seems like a lot of hassle with no real benefit. Cheers, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
