On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:36:24PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> Z and ZG clocks on sh73a0 have pll0 as their parent, not pll1. > > > > Thanks I have applied this to the soc5 branch and thus queued it up for v3.10. > > Please let me know if you would prefer me to push it as a fix for v3.9. > > And in that vein, if you regard it as -stable material. > > Thanks. > > Perhaps other people disagree, but I recommend not being so trigger > happy with -stable unless it will potentially give us some upside. > AFAIK there is no in-tree consumer of this clock anyway, so involving > -stable without further testing seems like a lot of hassle with no > real benefit. If there is no in-tree consumer then it is not v3.9 or -stable material. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
