On 9 February 2013 05:38, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/08/2013 03:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>> >>>> On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of >>>>> linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. >>>> >>>> >>>> I already did. Please check for-rafael branch >>> >>> >>> Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? >> >> >> OK, applied to bleeding-edge. Hopefully it will be build-tested over the >> weekend and I can move it to linux-next. >> >> I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some >> doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would >> conflict with your further changes. As soon as i read Rafael's mail, i realized Dirk's patch might be broken and immediately i saw your mail :) @Rafael: Sorry for not reviewing Nathan's patch well. I didn't knew much about RCU then. I am going through its lwn articles now ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
