On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. > > I already did. Please check for-rafael branch Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? > > Moreover, I'd very much prefer it if you fixed the problems introduced by > > b8eed8a "cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()" separately and *then* any > > other locking problems you're seeing in the code, although people are not > > reporting them. > > > > You seem to have a clear picture of how the code should work now, so that > > won't be a big trouble I guess. > > For me all problems are fixed in the current code. :) Sounds great. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
