On Saturday, February 09, 2013 07:40:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 February 2013 05:38, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/08/2013 03:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> > >>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of > >>>>> linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I already did. Please check for-rafael branch > >>> > >>> > >>> Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? > >> > >> > >> OK, applied to bleeding-edge. Hopefully it will be build-tested over the > >> weekend and I can move it to linux-next. > >> > >> I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some > >> doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would > >> conflict with your further changes. > > As soon as i read Rafael's mail, i realized Dirk's patch might be broken > and immediately i saw your mail :) > > @Rafael: Sorry for not reviewing Nathan's patch well. I didn't knew much about > RCU then. I am going through its lwn articles now ;) No biggie, I overlooked that myself first time. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
