On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, David C Niemi wrote: > I certainly have no objections to it going into the Linaro tree, though > I was hoping to get it into the main kernel tree too. What might prevent it from going into mainline at the moment, if anything? > Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:09:03AM -0500, David C Niemi wrote: > > > >> The general problem here is that the ondemand governor is aimed more at > >> power savings than performance. In cases where the ondemand governor > >> performs worse than the performance governor, the "sampling_down_factor" > >> tunable is often useful. I submitted the patch to add this tunable a > >> few weeks ago and it was acked by Venki, but I don't know what happened > >> to it after that. > >> > > > > Would you like to get it merged into linux-linaro? Given it's been ack'd > > I think Nicolas might be willing to consider it: > > > > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/10/6/4628889/thread > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
