Re: Issues with ondemand governor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I certainly have no objections to it going into the Linaro tree, though
I was hoping to get it into the main kernel tree too.

DCN

Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:09:03AM -0500, David C Niemi wrote:
>   
>> The general problem here is that the ondemand governor is aimed more at
>> power savings than performance.  In cases where the ondemand governor
>> performs worse than the performance governor, the "sampling_down_factor"
>> tunable is often useful.  I submitted the patch to add this tunable a
>> few weeks ago and it was acked by Venki, but I don't know what happened
>> to it after that.
>>     
>
> Would you like to get it merged into linux-linaro? Given it's been ack'd
> I think Nicolas might be willing to consider it:
>
>     http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/10/6/4628889/thread
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux