On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:59:39PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 04/26/2010 05:45 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> given the scheduler changes, these probably make more sense to go >>> via one of Ingo's trees ? >>> If everyone agrees, feel free to add my Signed-off-by: >> >> What about the issue Pavel reported and Willy confirmed (regression >> on older hardware)? > > Having a /sys tunable makes sense, especially when running > on battery power. I guess that can be introduced as a patch > 8/7 :) ... only if combined with sane default values. Best, Dominik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
