Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/26/2010 05:45 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:

given the scheduler changes, these probably make more sense to go
via one of Ingo's trees ?
If everyone agrees, feel free to add my Signed-off-by:

What about the issue Pavel reported and Willy confirmed (regression
on older hardware)?

Having a /sys tunable makes sense, especially when running
on battery power.  I guess that can be introduced as a patch
8/7 :)

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux