On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:49 +0800, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:37:43AM +0800, ykzhao wrote: > > Subject: [CPUFREQ]: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume > > From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Only CPU0 is available in course of cpufreq_suspend/resume. > > So it is unnecessary to do the smp_call for getting the current > > cpufreq. > > > > Add a flag of suspend/resume to avoid the smp_call in course of > > cpufreq_suspend/resume. > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13269 > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Christian Casteyde<casteyde.christian@xxxxxxx> > > All this goes away if we just made that suspend/resume code > conditional on powerpc as previously discussed. Do you mean that this issue exists on powerpc platform? How to resolve this issue on the Powerpc according to the discussion? Where can I get the patch? thanks. > > We don't need any of it on x86 afaict > > Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
