On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:37:43AM +0800, ykzhao wrote: > Subject: [CPUFREQ]: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume > From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> > > Only CPU0 is available in course of cpufreq_suspend/resume. > So it is unnecessary to do the smp_call for getting the current > cpufreq. > > Add a flag of suspend/resume to avoid the smp_call in course of > cpufreq_suspend/resume. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13269 > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Christian Casteyde<casteyde.christian@xxxxxxx> All this goes away if we just made that suspend/resume code conditional on powerpc as previously discussed. We don't need any of it on x86 afaict Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
