>
>> hi,
>>
>> thank you for clarification.
>>
>> i just wanted to test storage based fencing.
>> May i have to reconsider about using storage based fencing, but since my
>> actual fencing method(fence_cisco_ucs) use ip, i'm not 100% sure if this
>> is enough to keep my VMs safe.
>
>So you are running multiple VMs (and on them cluster) or cluster of bare
>metal machines with VMs (and they are not part of cluster)?
>
Hi,
yes, 2 baremetal nodes with pacemaker, running several VMs.
>Because for first case, it's best to use VMs fencing. For second case,
>fence_cisco_ucs is probably best method, because it will simply prohibit
>evinced node to access shared storage with VMs, so VMs are safe.
>
So fence_cisco_ucs should be enough, no storage based fencing needed?
>
>Regards,
> Honza
>
>>
>> i will file a bug for sbd
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
