Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: SBD 1.2.0 / corosync 2.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

thank you for clarification.

i just wanted to test storage based fencing.
May i have to reconsider about using storage based fencing, but since my actual fencing method(fence_cisco_ucs) use ip, i'm not 100% sure if this is enough to keep my VMs safe.

i will file a bug for sbd

regards

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux