Re: [corosync] Ideas on merging #linux-ha and #linux-cluster on freenode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has come up before, but I thought it might be worth
> discussing.
>
> With the cluster stacks merging, it strikes me that having two separate
> channels for effectively the same topic splits up folks. I know that
> #linux-ha technically still supports Heartbeat, but other than that, I
> see little difference between the two channels.
>
> I suppose a similar argument could me made for the myriad of mailing
> lists, too. I don't know if any of the lists really have significant
> enough load to cause a problem if the lists were merged. Could
> Linux-Cluster, Corosync and Pacemaker be merged?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Digimer, hoping a hornets nest wasn't just opened. :)
>

I think the only thing you missed was proposing a meta-project to rule
them all :-)

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux