On 05/27/2012 08:51 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm not sure if this has come up before, but I thought it might be worth >> discussing. >> >> With the cluster stacks merging, it strikes me that having two separate >> channels for effectively the same topic splits up folks. I know that >> #linux-ha technically still supports Heartbeat, but other than that, I >> see little difference between the two channels. >> >> I suppose a similar argument could me made for the myriad of mailing >> lists, too. I don't know if any of the lists really have significant >> enough load to cause a problem if the lists were merged. Could >> Linux-Cluster, Corosync and Pacemaker be merged? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Digimer, hoping a hornets nest wasn't just opened. :) >> > > I think the only thing you missed was proposing a meta-project to rule > them all :-) Let me dig around for that ring, I know it's somewhere... Joking aside though; All the different lists and channels made sense when there were different stacks and independent components. This is not really the case anymore though, and will become all the more less so in the future. I often worry when I suggest someone go somewhere for help that the right person who *could* have helped them is not in the given channel or list. I think it would benefit the community to have one channel and one list. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
