On 05/28/2012 10:51 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm not sure if this has come up before, but I thought it might be worth >> discussing. >> >> With the cluster stacks merging, it strikes me that having two separate >> channels for effectively the same topic splits up folks. I know that >> #linux-ha technically still supports Heartbeat, but other than that, I >> see little difference between the two channels. >> >> I suppose a similar argument could me made for the myriad of mailing >> lists, too. I don't know if any of the lists really have significant >> enough load to cause a problem if the lists were merged. Could >> Linux-Cluster, Corosync and Pacemaker be merged? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Digimer, hoping a hornets nest wasn't just opened. :) >> > > I think the only thing you missed was proposing a meta-project to rule > them all :-) ...One Totem Ring to rule them all, one Totem Ring to find them... If only Sauron had implemented RRP during the Second Age, things might have turned out differently for Middle Earth. SCNR, Tim -- Tim Serong Senior Clustering Engineer SUSE tserong@xxxxxxxx -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
