On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:30 PM, <linux-cluster-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to
linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
linux-cluster-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
linux-cluster-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)
2. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Fajar A. Nugraha)
3. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:46:10 +0300
From: Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: GFS2 versus ext3/4
Message-ID: <1303710370.21043.603.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with
active/passive cluster?
I'm working on a new PostgreSQL clustering setup, and I'm hardly
convinced that GFS2 will have more protection against ext3/4.
-- of course, I'm assuming that I'm fencing both nodes properly, so that
their connection with storage is cut off when needed.
Regards,
--
Devrim G?ND?Z
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/f489d129/attachment.bin>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:15:10 +0700
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4
Message-ID: <BANLkTikDdDK_HJrQZQcZwpJyGjzwfEEmJA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
2011/4/25 Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with
> active/passive cluster?
>
>
If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives more
performance compared to gfs(2).
--
FAN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/2094f4f0/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:42:32 +0300
From: Devrim G?ND?Z <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4
Message-ID: <1303713752.21043.622.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
> If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives
> more performance compared to gfs(2).
There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth
trying then.
Regards,
--
Devrim G?ND?Z
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.bin>
------------------------------
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
End of Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 84, Issue 29
*********************************************
--
Regards,
Prince Chauhan (mob:- 09467206219)
HCL Infosystem Ltd. CHANDIGARH
E-mail:- prince.hclpkl@xxxxxxxxx
Technology that touches lives TM
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
