Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with active/passive cluster? I'm working on a new PostgreSQL clustering setup, and I'm hardly convinced that GFS2 will have more protection against ext3/4. -- of course, I'm assuming that I'm fencing both nodes properly, so that their connection with storage is cut off when needed. Regards, -- Devrim GÃNDÃZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL DanÄÅmanÄ/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
