Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> 
> If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives
> more performance compared to gfs(2).

There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth
trying then.

Regards,
-- 
Devrim GÃNDÃZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL DanÄÅmanÄ/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux