On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Corey Kovacs <corey.kovacs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Folks, thanks for the info. > > If openais and corosync were at one time, serving the same function > but now are separate, what is the division? Different parts of the puzzle. Corosync is core functionality, Openais has the implementation of the SAF APIs: http://www.openais.org/doku.php > > > Thanks again > > -C > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Balazs Zachar <zachar@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/02/2010 10:31 PM, Corey Kovacs wrote: >>>> >>>> I've been watching the development of the cluster stack from the >>>> sidelines for quite some time but somewhere things got a bit mixed up >>>> for me. >>>> >>>> It appears to me the following is true... >>>> >>>> openais, heartbeat and corosync are equivalent in terms of purpose. >>>> >>> >>> AFAIK not true anymore: >>> heartbeat is equivalent with corosync + openais (corosync was a fork of >>> openais but now openais is an additional part for corosync) >>> Corosync + openais is recommended. (pacemaker website) >>>> >>>> rgmanager and pacemaker are equivalent in terms of purpose. >>>> >>> >>> True: >>> http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/wiki/RGManagerVsPacemaker >>> >>>> If these are true, can someone point me to a run-down of the >>>> differences and similarities or point me to a document? >>>> >>>> How does this all relate to what ships with RHEL6? >>>> >>> >>> RHCS is using rgmanager in RHEL6. Pacemaker is in technology preview state >>> (from release notes: "not fully integrated with the RHCS stack"). >> >> Specifically there is no integration with luci yet. >> Other than that its works just fine with the rest of the stack >> >>> I heard that Pacemaker is going to replace rgmanager in the future. (the >>> source wasn't official! Maybe we will get some more official answer for this >>> here :) ) >> >> That is the current intention >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Balázs >>>> >>>> Finally, is the wiki woefully out of date are is there a better place >>>> to be getting information other than git repos? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Corey >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Linux-cluster mailing list >>>> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Linux-cluster mailing list >>> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >>> >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >> > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
