On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Balazs Zachar <zachar@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/02/2010 10:31 PM, Corey Kovacs wrote: >> >> I've been watching the development of the cluster stack from the >> sidelines for quite some time but somewhere things got a bit mixed up >> for me. >> >> It appears to me the following is true... >> >> openais, heartbeat and corosync are equivalent in terms of purpose. >> > > AFAIK not true anymore: > heartbeat is equivalent with corosync + openais (corosync was a fork of > openais but now openais is an additional part for corosync) > Corosync + openais is recommended. (pacemaker website) >> >> rgmanager and pacemaker are equivalent in terms of purpose. >> > > True: > http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/wiki/RGManagerVsPacemaker > >> If these are true, can someone point me to a run-down of the >> differences and similarities or point me to a document? >> >> How does this all relate to what ships with RHEL6? >> > > RHCS is using rgmanager in RHEL6. Pacemaker is in technology preview state > (from release notes: "not fully integrated with the RHCS stack"). Specifically there is no integration with luci yet. Other than that its works just fine with the rest of the stack > I heard that Pacemaker is going to replace rgmanager in the future. (the > source wasn't official! Maybe we will get some more official answer for this > here :) ) That is the current intention > > Regards, > Balázs >> >> Finally, is the wiki woefully out of date are is there a better place >> to be getting information other than git repos? >> >> >> >> >> >> Corey >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >> > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
