On 12/02/2010 10:31 PM, Corey Kovacs wrote:
I've been watching the development of the cluster stack from the
sidelines for quite some time but somewhere things got a bit mixed up
for me.
It appears to me the following is true...
openais, heartbeat and corosync are equivalent in terms of purpose.
AFAIK not true anymore:
heartbeat is equivalent with corosync + openais (corosync was a fork of
openais but now openais is an additional part for corosync)
Corosync + openais is recommended. (pacemaker website)
rgmanager and pacemaker are equivalent in terms of purpose.
True:
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/wiki/RGManagerVsPacemaker
If these are true, can someone point me to a run-down of the
differences and similarities or point me to a document?
How does this all relate to what ships with RHEL6?
RHCS is using rgmanager in RHEL6. Pacemaker is in technology preview
state (from release notes: "not fully integrated with the RHCS stack").
I heard that Pacemaker is going to replace rgmanager in the future. (the
source wasn't official! Maybe we will get some more official answer for
this here :) )
Regards,
Balázs
Finally, is the wiki woefully out of date are is there a better place
to be getting information other than git repos?
Corey
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
