Two-Node Cluster Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

i have a Problem running a Two-Node Cluster (without qudisk) on RHEL 5.3
with all the latest Patches installed. For testing i use a very simple
setup with only one ip-address as the service.

Both nodes have two network-interfaces, both are configured in cluster.conf

<clusternodes>
   <clusternode name="10.102.10.51" nodeid="1" votes="1">
      <altname name="10.209.170.51"/>
         <fence>
            <method name="1">
               <device name="ipsdb01.drac"/>
            </method>
         </fence>
   </clusternode>
   <clusternode name="10.102.10.28" nodeid="2" votes="1">
      <altname name="10.209.170.28"/>
         <fence>
            <method name="1">
               <device name="ips08.drac"/>
            </method>
         </fence>
</clusternode>

When the service runs on node b and i take down the first interface
(10.209.170.28) with: 'ip link set eth1 down' the service is taken over
by node a within a few seconds. When i then disable the second interface
on node b i would expect that node a recognize the failure and fence
down node b but this does not happen. This only occurs in this one
direction, the other way - node a holds the service and need to be
fenced by node b works fine.

What could cause such a behaviour ?

Here are some more sniplets which could be interessting from my cluster.conf

<fence_daemon clean_start="1" post_fail_delay="10" post_join_delay="30"/>

<cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1">

Most of the configuration was done using conga (luci,ricci)


Regards
Marco

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux