Did you have: <cman two_node="1" expected_votes="1"/> ? -- Tiago Cruz <tiagocruz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:00 +0200, Marco Nietz wrote: > Hi, > > i have a Problem running a Two-Node Cluster (without qudisk) on RHEL 5.3 > with all the latest Patches installed. For testing i use a very simple > setup with only one ip-address as the service. > > Both nodes have two network-interfaces, both are configured in cluster.conf > > <clusternodes> > <clusternode name="10.102.10.51" nodeid="1" votes="1"> > <altname name="10.209.170.51"/> > <fence> > <method name="1"> > <device name="ipsdb01.drac"/> > </method> > </fence> > </clusternode> > <clusternode name="10.102.10.28" nodeid="2" votes="1"> > <altname name="10.209.170.28"/> > <fence> > <method name="1"> > <device name="ips08.drac"/> > </method> > </fence> > </clusternode> > > When the service runs on node b and i take down the first interface > (10.209.170.28) with: 'ip link set eth1 down' the service is taken over > by node a within a few seconds. When i then disable the second interface > on node b i would expect that node a recognize the failure and fence > down node b but this does not happen. This only occurs in this one > direction, the other way - node a holds the service and need to be > fenced by node b works fine. > > What could cause such a behaviour ? > > Here are some more sniplets which could be interessting from my cluster.conf > > <fence_daemon clean_start="1" post_fail_delay="10" post_join_delay="30"/> > > <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"> > > Most of the configuration was done using conga (luci,ricci) > > > Regards > Marco > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
