Re: generic error on gfs status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
I will upgrade the rgmanager from rgmanager-1.9.54-1 to rgmanager-1.9.54-3.228823test.
 
Do you think that it is the service script that is failing the status check?  Or do you think that clusterfs.sh is failing the status check? 
 
David

 
On 4/9/07, Lon Hohberger <lhh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> dlm_lkb           3318298 3318298    232   17    1 : tunables  120   60    8
> : slabdata 195194 195194      0

^^ That is definitely 212644; use aforementioned packages to fix.

It is actually likely that in your case, the status check is failing
because of it because you're using GFS as part of a service.

-- Lon

--
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux