On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 09:28 -0800, Dylan Vanderhoof wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm using the source version of linux-cluster found here: > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/cluster/releases/ > Which is working quite well for me except some performance problems, but > I've notice that nobody actually refers to these version numbers ever. > What do these versions correspond to? Or do they at all? They *approximately* map to RHEL4 update cycles. e.g. cluster-1.00.X ~= RHEL4 update X (but for kernel.org) However, they get out of sync pretty rapidly. > Also, does anybody know with what frequency the source tarballs at the > above location are updated with performance and other bugfixes? I'm > wondering if I might not be better off trying to find a stable branch of > CVS or something similar, but unfortunately finding information about > running GFS on non-redhat boxes from source is somewhat difficult to > come by. Using CVS STABLE branch is your best bet. We don't put anything experimental in there; only fixes/small features which have been tested already. The STABLE branch is basically the same as the RHEL4 branch except that it tracks kernel.org instead of the RHEL4 kernels. -- Lon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
