Re: gfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:17:38 -0600
gabe@xxxxxxxxxxx (Gabe Turner) wrote:

> The DS4100, provided your's has two controllers, should have about 512MB of
> RAID cache total. 

Yes.

> If this is the LSI/Engenio-based SATA storage I'm
> thinking of, you should be able to turn on write cache on the controllers
> via the management interface while the unit is live in order to see if it
> makes much of a difference. 

I checked again, it's on for both volumes.

Any other ideas?

I'm thinking of trying the same test with ocfs2. If it gives me similiar
numbers, then the bottleneck is underlying hardware, else it must be gfs.


-- 

Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org/

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux