Re: gfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:12:51 -0600
Eric Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not sure what kind of disk backend you have, but you are probably 
> thrashing the heads on the disks, making the disks do a lot of seeks, 
> burning your performance.  I don't think this is a GFS performance issue 
> really.  You could try a memory backed disk with GFS on it, and see if 
> the performance falls at all.
> 
I wrote that down under comments:
"Shared storage is IBM DS4100, configured with two raid5 volumes of 7 disks each"

It's true that DS4100 is no high performer, but I'd say all that write cache should make a difference with seeks?

Also, does anyone have any numbers to compare?


-- 

Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux