Re: GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Troy Dawson <dawson@xxxxxxxx>, linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?
From: Chris Feist <cfeist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:00:41 -0500
Cc:
In-reply-to: <42A4B61E.9020908@fnal.gov>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <42A4AA47.1070001@fnal.gov> <42A4B257.60908@redhat.com> <42A4B61E.9020908@fnal.gov>
Reply-to: cfeist@xxxxxxxxxx, linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513)

Troy Dawson wrote:

OK, sounds good.
And by x86, you mean i386, i686 ... correct?


correct.

Thanks,
Chris

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

References:
- GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?
  - From: Troy Dawson
- Re: GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?
  - From: Chris Feist
- Re: GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?
  - From: Troy Dawson

Prev by Date: RE: GFS questions to have a final decision
Next by Date: Re: GFS questions to have a final decision
Previous by thread: Re: GFS-6.0.2.20-2 - no athlon?
Next by thread: Can I use cman instead of the HA (High Availability) package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux