- rob
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 09:28 -0400, Gerald G. Gilyeat wrote:
With that in mind, is there a planned release date for it yet?
It would be useful to know for planning purposes (especially for me... ;) )
Thanks!
--
Jerry Gilyeat, RHCE
Systems Administrator
Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
Sent: Mon 6/6/2005 9:09 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: GFS questions to have a final decision
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:00:53PM -0000, Raj Kumar wrote:
> IMHO, you don't need a third server just to run the "lock server". You can
> run the lock server on one of the two nodes... this is the configuration I
> use: two HP DL380 G3 servers running GFS to simultaneously access MSA
> 1000...
> I dont know whether ML370 is supported by V3...
In RHEL3 the locking system is gulm, gulm requires 3 nodes for
redunancy. You can run in with only one, but if that goes, teh cluster
goes.
Comming in RHEL4 (and which is the current CVS) we switched to cman/dlm.
This system can have only two nodes. (and also doesn't have lock servers
as every node is an equal.)
--
Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Robert Kenna / Red Hat Sr Product Mgr - Storage o: (978) 392-2410 (x22410) c: (978) 771-6314 rkenna@xxxxxxxxxx |
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
