On 2023/8/3 3:39, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:48:09PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: >> On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>>> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>>>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>>>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation. >>>>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only >>>>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin? >>>>> >>>>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6. >>>> >>>> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have >>>> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first. >>> >>> You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out >>> the merge conflicts later. >> >> Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" >> has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself. > > Ah, I see. That patch isn't going to go through cgroup/for-6.6. It will go > directly from -mm to mainline when the merge window opens. Can you please > resend the patch to Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> with me cc'd? > Will do. Thanks. :)
