On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: >> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation. >>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only >>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin? >>> >>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6. >> >> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have >> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first. > > You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out > the merge conflicts later. Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself. Thanks for your advice.
