On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:48:09PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > >> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote: > >>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > >>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation. > >>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only > >>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin? > >>> > >>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6. > >> > >> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have > >> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first. > > > > You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out > > the merge conflicts later. > > Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" > has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself. Ah, I see. That patch isn't going to go through cgroup/for-6.6. It will go directly from -mm to mainline when the merge window opens. Can you please resend the patch to Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> with me cc'd? Thanks. -- tejun
