(2012/06/25 17:44), Wanpeng Li wrote: > From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit to save cpu cycle. > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@xxxxxxxxx> I can't understand the benefit of this patch to the real world... So, if you wrote the patch description as "clean up" rather than optimize, ok, I'll agree. Thanks, -Kame > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index 2e81328..4520b57 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -3917,9 +3917,9 @@ static void memcg_get_hierarchical_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > > min_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT); > min_memsw_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT); > - cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup; > if (!memcg->use_hierarchy) > goto out; > + cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup; > > while (cgroup->parent) { > cgroup = cgroup->parent; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html