On Mon 25-06-12 16:44:32, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit to save cpu cycle.
How did you check that this actually saves some cycles?
There are no (compiler) barriers here so it should reordered.
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2e81328..4520b57 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3917,9 +3917,9 @@ static void memcg_get_hierarchical_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> min_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
> min_memsw_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
> - cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup;
> if (!memcg->use_hierarchy)
> goto out;
> + cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup;
>
> while (cgroup->parent) {
> cgroup = cgroup->parent;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
