On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:52:25PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: >(2012/06/25 17:44), Wanpeng Li wrote: >> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit to save cpu cycle. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@xxxxxxxxx> > >I can't understand the benefit of this patch to the real world... > >So, if you wrote the patch description as "clean up" rather than optimize, >ok, I'll agree. OK, I will change to "Cleanup". Thank you Kame. Best Regards, Wanpeng Li > >Thanks, >-Kame > >> --- >> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c >> index 2e81328..4520b57 100644 >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >> @@ -3917,9 +3917,9 @@ static void memcg_get_hierarchical_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, >> >> min_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT); >> min_memsw_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT); >> - cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup; >> if (!memcg->use_hierarchy) >> goto out; >> + cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup; >> >> while (cgroup->parent) { >> cgroup = cgroup->parent; >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html