Hello Albert, 5 vs 3 MON => you won't notice any difference 5 vs 3 MGR => by default, only 1 will be active Le sam. 18 nov. 2023 à 09:28, Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@xxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Le 17/11/2023 à 11:23:49+0100, David C. a écrit > > Hi, > > > > > 5 instead of 3 mon will allow you to limit the impact if you break a mon > (for > > example, with the file system full) > > > > 5 instead of 3 MDS, this makes sense if the workload can be distributed > over > > several trees in your file system. Sometimes it can also make sense to > have > > several FSs in order to limit the consequences of an infrastructure with > > several active MDSs. > > So no disadvantage to have 5 instead of 3 ? > > > Concerning performance, if you see a node that is too busy which impacts > the > > cluster, you can always think about relocating certain services. > > Ok, thanks for the answer. > > Regards. > > -- > Albert SHIH 🦫 🐸 > Observatoire de Paris > France > Heure locale/Local time: > sam. 18 nov. 2023 09:26:56 CET > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |