Le 17/11/2023 à 11:23:49+0100, David C. a écrit Hi, > > 5 instead of 3 mon will allow you to limit the impact if you break a mon (for > example, with the file system full) > > 5 instead of 3 MDS, this makes sense if the workload can be distributed over > several trees in your file system. Sometimes it can also make sense to have > several FSs in order to limit the consequences of an infrastructure with > several active MDSs. So no disadvantage to have 5 instead of 3 ? > Concerning performance, if you see a node that is too busy which impacts the > cluster, you can always think about relocating certain services. Ok, thanks for the answer. Regards. -- Albert SHIH 🦫 🐸 Observatoire de Paris France Heure locale/Local time: sam. 18 nov. 2023 09:26:56 CET _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |