This is my understanding as well: as with CRUSH tunable sets, features *happen* to be named after releases don't always correlate 1:1. > On May 25, 2023, at 15:49, Wesley Dillingham <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fairly confident this is normal. I just checked a pacific cluster and they > all report luminous as well. I think some of the backstory of this is > luminous is the release where up-maps were released and there hasnt been a > reason to increment the features release of subsequent daemons. > > To be honest I am not confident that "ceph osd > set-require-min-compat-client nautilus" is a necessary step for you. What > prompted you to run that command? > > That step is not listed here: > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/nautilus/#upgrading-from-mimic-or-luminous > > but its been a bit since ive operated a pre-nautilus release. > > Respectfully, > > *Wes Dillingham* > wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> > > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 3:14 PM Oliver Schmidt <os@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Marc, >> >>> >>> I think for an upgrade the rocksdb is necessary. Check this for your >> monitors >>> >>> cat /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-a/kv_backend >> >> Thanks, but I already had migrated all mons to use rocksdb when upgrading >> to Luminous. >> >> ~ # cat /srv/ceph/mon/ceph-host1/kv_backend >> rocksdb >> >> Is this what you expect here? >> >> Best regards >> Oliver >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |