Thank you all! It's exactly what I needed. On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:51 AM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > There also is https://tracker.ceph.com/versions/656 which seems to be > > tracking > > the open issues tagged for this particular point release. > > > > Yes, thank you for providing the link. > > If you don't mind me asking Laura, have those issues regarding the > > testing lab been resolved yet? > > > > There are currently a lot of folks working to fix the testing lab issues. > Essentially, disk corruption affected our ability to reach quay.ceph.io. > We've made progress this morning, but we are still working to understand > the root cause of the corruption. We expect to re-deploy affected services > soon so we can resume testing for v16.2.11. > > You can follow updates on the two Tracker issues below: > > 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57914 > 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57935 > > > There are quite a few bugfixes in the pending release 16.2.11 which we > > are waiting for. TBH I was about > > to ask if it would not be sensible to do an intermediate release and not > > let it grow bigger and > > bigger (with even more changes / fixes) going out at once. > > > > Fixes for v16.2.11 are pretty much paused at this point; the bottleneck > lies in getting some outstanding patches tested before they are backported. > Whether we stop now or continue to introduce more patches, the timeframe > for getting things tested remains the same. > > I hope this clears up some of the questions. > > Thanks, > Laura Flores > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 9:41 AM Christian Rohmann < > christian.rohmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 28/10/2022 00:25, Laura Flores wrote: > > > Hi Oleksiy, > > > > > > The Pacific RC has not been declared yet since there have been problems > > in > > > our upstream testing lab. There is no ETA yet for v16.2.11 for that > > reason, > > > but the full diff of all the patches that were included will be > published > > > to ceph.io when v16.2.11 is released. There will also be a diff > > published > > > in the documentation on this page: > > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/ > > > > > > In the meantime, here is a link to the diff in commits between v16.2.10 > > and > > > the Pacific branch: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/compare/v16.2.10...pacific > > > > There also is https://tracker.ceph.com/versions/656 which seems to be > > tracking > > the open issues tagged for this particular point release. > > > > > > If you don't mind me asking Laura, have those issues regarding the > > testing lab been resolved yet? > > > > There are quite a few bugfixes in the pending release 16.2.11 which we > > are waiting for. TBH I was about > > to ask if it would not be sensible to do an intermediate release and not > > let it grow bigger and > > bigger (with even more changes / fixes) going out at once. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > -- > > Laura Flores > > She/Her/Hers > > Software Engineer, Ceph Storage > > Red Hat Inc. <https://www.redhat.com> > > Chicago, IL > > lflores@xxxxxxxxxx > M: +17087388804 <(708)%20738-8804> > @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> > <https://www.redhat.com> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |