Hi Christian, There also is https://tracker.ceph.com/versions/656 which seems to be > tracking > the open issues tagged for this particular point release. > Yes, thank you for providing the link. If you don't mind me asking Laura, have those issues regarding the > testing lab been resolved yet? > There are currently a lot of folks working to fix the testing lab issues. Essentially, disk corruption affected our ability to reach quay.ceph.io. We've made progress this morning, but we are still working to understand the root cause of the corruption. We expect to re-deploy affected services soon so we can resume testing for v16.2.11. You can follow updates on the two Tracker issues below: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57914 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57935 There are quite a few bugfixes in the pending release 16.2.11 which we > are waiting for. TBH I was about > to ask if it would not be sensible to do an intermediate release and not > let it grow bigger and > bigger (with even more changes / fixes) going out at once. > Fixes for v16.2.11 are pretty much paused at this point; the bottleneck lies in getting some outstanding patches tested before they are backported. Whether we stop now or continue to introduce more patches, the timeframe for getting things tested remains the same. I hope this clears up some of the questions. Thanks, Laura Flores On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 9:41 AM Christian Rohmann < christian.rohmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 28/10/2022 00:25, Laura Flores wrote: > > Hi Oleksiy, > > > > The Pacific RC has not been declared yet since there have been problems > in > > our upstream testing lab. There is no ETA yet for v16.2.11 for that > reason, > > but the full diff of all the patches that were included will be published > > to ceph.io when v16.2.11 is released. There will also be a diff > published > > in the documentation on this page: > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/ > > > > In the meantime, here is a link to the diff in commits between v16.2.10 > and > > the Pacific branch: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/compare/v16.2.10...pacific > > There also is https://tracker.ceph.com/versions/656 which seems to be > tracking > the open issues tagged for this particular point release. > > > If you don't mind me asking Laura, have those issues regarding the > testing lab been resolved yet? > > There are quite a few bugfixes in the pending release 16.2.11 which we > are waiting for. TBH I was about > to ask if it would not be sensible to do an intermediate release and not > let it grow bigger and > bigger (with even more changes / fixes) going out at once. > > > > Regards > > > Christian > > -- Laura Flores She/Her/Hers Software Engineer, Ceph Storage Red Hat Inc. <https://www.redhat.com> Chicago, IL lflores@xxxxxxxxxx M: +17087388804 @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |