Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> The demand for LTS - at least in our case - does not stem from
> unprofessionalism or biased opinion.
> It's the desire to stay up to date on security patches as much as
> possible while maintaining a well tested and stable environment.

Is this not the definition of Long Term Stable? ;)

> Both Pacific and Octopus (we’re currently on Nautilus) have some
> problems within themselves that made us not upgrading our cluster.

Same here.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux