https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4b2736a28c ^^ if people want to test and provide feedback for a potential merge to EPEL8 stable. David On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:43 AM David Orman <ormandj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm wondering if this was installed using pip/pypi before, and now > switched to using EPEL? That would explain it - 1.2.1 may never have > been pushed to EPEL. > > David > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM David Orman <ormandj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We'd worked on pushing a change to fix > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50526 for a deadlock in remoto here: > > https://github.com/alfredodeza/remoto/pull/63 > > > > A new version, 1.2.1, was built to help with this. With the Ceph > > release 16.2.6 (at least), we see 1.1.4 is again part of the > > containers. Looking at EPEL8, all that is built now is 1.1.4. We're > > not sure what happened, but would it be possible to get 1.2.1 pushed > > to EPEL8 again, and figure out why it was removed? We'd then need a > > rebuild of the 16.2.6 containers to 'fix' this bug. > > > > This is definitely a high urgency bug, as it impacts any deployments > > with medium to large counts of OSDs or split db/wal devices, like many > > modern deployments. > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18747 > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/ > > > > Respectfully, > > David Orman _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |