Den tis 27 juli 2021 kl 12:32 skrev Rok Jaklič <rjaklic@xxxxxxxxx>: > Actually, some of us tried to contribute to documentation but were stopped > with failed build checks for some reason. > While most of it is ok, at some places documentation is vague or missing > (maybe also the reason why this thread is so long also). > > One example: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40965/commits/9bd1fc55fffff73b4d243de018ecd0939543f950 That is a very good diff actually. Lots of ways to trap the newcomers if you keep mixing up node names. Same with all the places where rgw and radosgw gets used and referenced intermixed so you never know if an rgw config option or auth ticket should be (client.)rgw.shorthostname or (client.)radosgw.shorthostname just by being abbreviated in two different ways. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |