In theory - would 'cephfs root' out-perform 'rbd root'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On any given a properly sized ceph setup, for other than database end
use) theoretically shouldn't a ceph-fs root out-perform any fs atop a
rados block device root?

Seems to me like it ought to: moving only the 'interesting' bits of
files over the so-called 'public' network should take fewer, smaller
packets than the overhead associated with whole blocks that hold some
fraction of the 'interesting' bits?

Does it work that way in practice?




_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux