Isn't this somewhat reliant on the OSD type? Redhat/Micron/Samsung/Supermicro have all put out white papers backing the idea of 2 copies on NVMe's as safe for production. From: "Magnus HAGDORN" <Magnus.Hagdorn@xxxxxxxx> To: pseudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 4:43:08 AM Subject: Re: Worst thing that can happen if I have size= 2 On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 09:39 +0000, Max Krasilnikov wrote: > > if a OSD becomes unavailble (broken disk, rebooting server) then > > all > > I/O to the PGs stored on that OSD will block until replication > > level of > > 2 is reached again. So, for a highly available cluster you need a > > replication level of 3 > > > AFAIK, with min_size 1 it is possible to write even to only active > OSD serving > yes, that's correct but then you seriously risk trashing your data The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |