On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:06 PM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dan & Janek, > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:26 AM Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My understanding is that the recall thresholds (see my list below) > > should be scaled proportionally. OTOH, I haven't played with the decay > > rates (and don't know if there's any significant value to tuning > > those). > > I haven't gone through this thread yet but I want to note for those > reading that we do now have documentation (thanks for the frequent > pokes Janek!) for the recall configurations: > > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephfs/cache-configuration/#mds-recall > > Please let us know if it's missing information or if something could > be more clear. I also now have a PR open for updating the defaults based on these and other discussions: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38574 Feedback welcome. -- Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D. He / Him / His Principal Software Engineer Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |