Benchmark WAL/DB on SSD and HDD for RGW RBD CephFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I'm trying to find performance penalty with OSD HDD when using WAL/DB in faster device (SSD/NVMe) vs WAL/DB in same device (HDD) for different workload (RBD, RGW with index bucket in SSD pool, and CephFS with metadata in SSD pool). I want to know if giving up disk slot for WAL/DB device is worth vs adding more OSD.

Unfortunately I cannot find the benchmark for these kind workload. Has anyone ever done this benchmark?

Thank you.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux