Re: Architecture - Recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Radhakrishnan2 S (radhakrishnan2.s@xxxxxxx):
> Where hypervisor would be your Ceph nodes. I.e. you can connect your
> Ceph nodes on L2 or make them part of the L3 setup (more modern way of
> doing it). You can use "ECMP" to add more network capacity when you need
> it. Setting up a BGP EVPN VXLAN network is not trivial ... I advise on
> getting networking expertise in your team.
> 
> Radha: Thanks for the reference. We are planning to have a dedicated
> set of nodes, for our ceph cluster and not make it hyperconverged. Do
> you see that as a recommended option ? Since we might also have
> baremetal servers for workloads, we want to make the storage as a
> separate dedicated one. 

I would definately recommend that, especially for larger deployments.
Although this might look old fashioned as the rest of the world is
changing everything in containers. It makes (performance) debugging *a
lot* easier as you can actually isolate things. Something which is way
more difficult to achieve in servers where you have a complex workload
going on ...

I guess (no proof of that) that performance will be more consistent as
well.

Gr. Stefan

-- 
| BIT BV  https://www.bit.nl/        Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
| GPG: 0xD14839C6                   +31 318 648 688 / info@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux